|
Scotland's very own ISP |
Future of Europe Debate continued |
In addition to its Chairman and two Vice-Chairmen, the Convention is composed of: |
· 15 representatives of the Heads of State or Government of the Member States (one from each Member State) |
· 13 representatives of the Heads of State or Government of the candidate States (1 per candidate State) |
· 30 representatives of the national parliaments of the Member States (two from each Member State) |
· 26 representatives of the national parliaments of the candidate States (two from each candidate State) |
· 16 members of the European Parliament |
· 2 representatives of the European Commission |
|
Alternates for each full member state |
The Scottish Executive’s key proposals on the Future of Europe include: |
· The need to set out the division of powers between the EU on the one hand and Member States and Sub Member State Administrations (SMSAs) on the other. |
· The development of a Statement of Subsidiarity Principles and the introduction of an independent, subsidiarity watchdog to ensure the important principle of subsidiarity is better applied in the EU; |
· Requirement for assessment of the potential financial impact of EU legislation compared to the value of the benefits; |
· Greater involvement for SMSAs in the EU decision-making process; |
· European Commission should consult with implementing authorities at the pre-legislative stage, based on a code of practice; |
· Greater use of framework proposals rather than rigid legislation to allow flexible implementation that is sensitive to local and regional circumstances. |
· Review of the role and status of the Committee of the Regions |
· Operation of the Commission should be constrained by the strict observance of the following: |
· act within limits of powers conferred by Treaties; |
· the principle of subsidiarity; |
· the principle of proportionality; |
· obligation to respect national identity of Member States, which includes identity/cultural diversity of the regions. |
Enhance the accountability, effectiveness, proximity and transparency of the European |